Radeon E8950 vs Pro WX 5100
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro WX 5100 with Radeon E8950, including specs and performance data.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 423 | 424 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.57 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.42 | 10.59 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | Amethyst |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 November 2016 (9 years ago) | 29 September 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 121.6 | 128.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.892 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.07 | 13.06 |
| Recency | 18 November 2016 | 29 September 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 95 Watt |
Pro WX 5100 has a 0% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 27% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon E8950.
Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon E8950 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
