Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

#ad 
Buy Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon Instinct MI6 Radeon Pro Duo Polaris Radeon Pro V7300X Radeon Pro V7350X2 Radeon Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
VS
Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Max-Q Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 5100 with Quadro P2000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 5100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.03
+3.8%

Pro WX 5100 outperforms P2000 Max-Q by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 5100
P2000 Max-Q P2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking380393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.42no data
Power efficiency12.91no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameEllesmereGP107GL
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date18 November 2016 (8 years ago)5 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792768
Core clock speed713 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speed1086 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate121.6no data
Floating-point processing power3.892 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 5100 13.03
+3.8%
P2000 Max-Q 12.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 5100 5491
+3.8%
P2000 Max-Q 5290

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+0%
50
+0%
4K18−21
−11.1%
20
+11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.98no data
4K27.72no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+0%
12
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Pro WX 5100 and P2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • P2000 Max-Q is 11% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.03 12.55
Recency 18 November 2016 5 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB

Pro WX 5100 has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

P2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Quadro P2000 Max-Q.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a workstation card while Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon Pro WX 5100
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
vs
PRO W6300 Radeon PRO W6300
P2000 Max-Q Quadro P2000 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 20 Radeon Pro Vega 20
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
vs
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
RTX 2080 Ti 2080 Ti
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
RTX 2060 2060
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
RTX 2070 2070
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
RTX 5000 5000
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
Tesla T4 T4
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
RX 590 590
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
GTX 1650 1650
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
GTX 1660 1660
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
Radeon 550 550
Pro WX 5100 AMD Pro WX 5100
vs
Pro WX 3200 WX 3200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 97 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 5100 or Quadro P2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.