ATI Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition vs Pro WX 4150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking619not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBaffinRV670
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2017 (8 years ago)12 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896320
Core clock speed1002 MHz777 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate58.9712.43
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS0.4973 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs5616
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1126 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s72.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2017 12 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 106 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 112% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
ATI Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition
Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4150 or Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.