GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGMA 600GM206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2010 (15 years ago)26 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores41024
Core clock speed400 MHz1176 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1201 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data76.86
Floating-point processing powerno data2.46 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1753 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 26 November 2015
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm

GTX 960 OEM has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and GeForce GTX 960 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 960 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
GeForce GTX 960 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 58 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 or GeForce GTX 960 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.