ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs Pro WX 4150
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 with Mobility Radeon HD 5650, including specs and performance data.
Pro 4150 outperforms Mobility HD 5650 by a whopping 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 630 | 1076 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 9.49 | 6.46 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | Madison |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 (8 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 400 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 627 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 | 9.000 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.887 TFLOPS | 0.36 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 8 |
| TMUs | 56 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 40 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 70−75
+367%
| 15
−367%
|
| Full HD | 75−80
+369%
| 16
−369%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+400%
|
6−7
−400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+2600%
|
1−2
−2600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+400%
|
6−7
−400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+1167%
|
3−4
−1167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+156%
|
9−10
−156%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+112%
|
30−35
−112%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+2600%
|
1−2
−2600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+400%
|
6−7
−400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
+164%
|
39
−164%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+1167%
|
3−4
−1167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+156%
|
9−10
−156%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+112%
|
30−35
−112%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+2600%
|
1−2
−2600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+156%
|
9−10
−156%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+112%
|
30−35
−112%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+1167%
|
3−4
−1167%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
+500%
|
8−9
−500%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+2233%
|
3−4
−2233%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
This is how Pro WX 4150 and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:
- Pro WX 4150 is 367% faster in 900p
- Pro WX 4150 is 369% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 2600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Pro WX 4150 surpassed ATI Mobility HD 5650 in all 49 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.17 | 1.26 |
| Recency | 1 March 2017 | 7 January 2010 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Pro WX 4150 has a 389.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
ATI Mobility HD 5650, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
