GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	563	125
Place by popularity	not in top-100	46
Power efficiency	9.52	51.68
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Baffin	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	2560
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	1455 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	1755 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	140.4
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	56	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.60

RTX 4050 Mobile 35.83
+443%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2658

RTX 4050 Mobile 14430
+443%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −494%	95 +494%
1440p	8−9 −500%	48 +500%
4K	5−6 −520%	31 +520%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −508%	79 +508%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −636%	103 +636%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −364%	100−110 +364%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −446%	71 +446%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −193%	41 +193%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −629%	204 +629%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −538%	102 +538%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −406%	90−95 +406%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −270%	70−75 +270%
Valorant	24−27 −671%	185 +671%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −364%	100−110 +364%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −354%	59 +354%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −157%	36 +157%
Dota 2	24−27 −483%	140 +483%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −213%	97 +213%
Fortnite	40−45 −305%	160−170 +305%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −500%	168 +500%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −500%	95−100 +500%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −425%	126 +425%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −77.8%	32 +77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −252%	190−200 +252%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −270%	70−75 +270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −529%	130−140 +529%
Valorant	24−27 −525%	150−160 +525%
World of Tanks	100−110 −161%	270−280 +161%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −364%	100−110 +364%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −292%	51 +292%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −136%	33 +136%
Dota 2	24−27 −575%	162 +575%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −206%	95−100 +206%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −418%	145 +418%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −400%	80 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −252%	190−200 +252%
Valorant	24−27 −475%	138 +475%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −625%	58 +625%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −625%	58 +625%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −326%	160−170 +326%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −517%	35−40 +517%
World of Tanks	50−55 −378%	230−240 +378%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −200%	18 +200%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −764%	120−130 +764%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −546%	84 +546%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −520%	60−65 +520%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −720%	80−85 +720%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −490%	59 +490%
Valorant	18−20 −411%	92 +411%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8 −25%
Dota 2	18−20 −256%	64 +256%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −276%	64 +276%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1400%	45 +1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −505%	120−130 +505%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −276%	64 +276%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −617%	40−45 +617%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +11.1%	9 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9 +350%
Dota 2	18−20 −539%	115 +539%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −588%	55−60 +588%
Fortnite	7−8 −643%	50−55 +643%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −563%	53 +563%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Valorant	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4050 Mobile is 494% faster in 1080p
RTX 4050 Mobile is 500% faster in 1440p
RTX 4050 Mobile is 520% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 25% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4050 Mobile is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
RTX 4050 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.60	35.83
Recency	1 March 2017	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm

RTX 4050 Mobile has a 442.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.