GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 with GeForce GT 740M, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.92
+233%

Pro WX 4150 outperforms GT 740M by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking561880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.544.35
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameBaffinGK208
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896384
Core clock speed1002 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate58.9731.36
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS0.7526 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataDDR3/GDDR5
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.92
+233%
GT 740M 2.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2658
+233%
GT 740M 798

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+213%
16
−213%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Valorant 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Dota 2 24−27
+380%
5
−380%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Fortnite 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+243%
7
−243%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+180%
20−22
−180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+200%
7
−200%
Valorant 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
World of Tanks 100−110
+98.1%
54
−98.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Dota 2 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+180%
20−22
−180%
Valorant 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
World of Tanks 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Valorant 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Valorant 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and GT 740M compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 4150 is 213% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 45 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.92 2.08
Recency 1 March 2017 20 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has a 232.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GT 740M, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 740M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 740M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GeForce GT 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1084 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.