Radeon HD 6930 vs Pro WX 4130
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4130 with Radeon HD 6930, including specs and performance data.
HD 6930 outperforms Pro WX 4130 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 664 | 586 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.88 |
| Power efficiency | 7.38 | 2.77 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | Cayman |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 December 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $180 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 2,640 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 186 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 42.12 | 60.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.348 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| TMUs | 40 | 80 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 220 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−36.4%
|
30−33
+36.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| God of War | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−35%
|
27−30
+35%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−36.4%
|
30−33
+36.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−30.4%
|
30−33
+30.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
| God of War | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−26.3%
|
24−27
+26.3%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
−39.3%
|
85−90
+39.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−35%
|
27−30
+35%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−36.4%
|
30−33
+36.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 85−90
−29.4%
|
110−120
+29.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
−31%
|
55−60
+31%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−30.4%
|
30−33
+30.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
| God of War | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−31.3%
|
21−24
+31.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−26.3%
|
24−27
+26.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
−39.3%
|
85−90
+39.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−35%
|
27−30
+35%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
−31%
|
55−60
+31%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−30.4%
|
30−33
+30.4%
|
| God of War | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−26.3%
|
24−27
+26.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
−39.3%
|
85−90
+39.3%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
−31.6%
|
50−55
+31.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−38.9%
|
50−55
+38.9%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
−38.9%
|
75−80
+38.9%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−33.3%
|
16−18
+33.3%
|
| God of War | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−20%
|
30−33
+20%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
| God of War | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.84 | 6.75 |
| Recency | 1 March 2017 | 1 December 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 186 Watt |
Pro WX 4130 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 272% lower power consumption.
HD 6930, on the other hand, has a 39.5% higher aggregate performance score.
The Radeon HD 6930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4130 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 6930 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
