GeForce Go 7600 GT vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4130 with GeForce Go 7600 GT, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4130
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.48
+853%

Pro 4130 outperforms 7600 by a whopping 853% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6791282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.22no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameBaffinG73
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2017 (8 years ago)1 August 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64017
Core clock speed1002 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.126.000
Floating-point processing power1.348 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs4012
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 4130 4.48
+853%
Go 7600 GT 0.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4130 1980
+843%
Samples: 40
Go 7600 GT 210
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Fortnite 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Valorant 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+388%
16−18
−388%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dota 2 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Fortnite 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Valorant 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dota 2 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Valorant 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Valorant 50−55
+940%
5−6
−940%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 4130 is 1750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 4130 surpassed Go 7600 GT in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.48 0.47
Recency 1 March 2017 1 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Pro WX 4130 has a 853.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce Go 7600 GT is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 4130
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
GeForce Go 7600 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4130 or GeForce Go 7600 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.