GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4130 with GeForce GTX 675M SLI, including specs and performance data.
GTX 675M SLI outperforms Pro WX 4130 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 593 | 501 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 8.32 | 2.99 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | N12E-GTX2 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 (7 years ago) | 6 January 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 2x 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 42.12 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.348 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 40 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
| SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| Optimus | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
| CUDA | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
−21.4%
|
16−18
+21.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−30.8%
|
16−18
+30.8%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−47.4%
|
27−30
+47.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
−21.4%
|
16−18
+21.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−30.8%
|
16−18
+30.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−40%
|
35−40
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−53.3%
|
21−24
+53.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−33.3%
|
24−27
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
−68.4%
|
30−35
+68.4%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−47.4%
|
27−30
+47.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
−21.4%
|
16−18
+21.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−30.8%
|
16−18
+30.8%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−47.6%
|
30−35
+47.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
−32.1%
|
35−40
+32.1%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−41.7%
|
50−55
+41.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−40%
|
35−40
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−55%
|
30−35
+55%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−53.3%
|
21−24
+53.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
−36%
|
65−70
+36%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−33.3%
|
24−27
+33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−36.8%
|
24−27
+36.8%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
−68.4%
|
30−35
+68.4%
|
| World of Tanks | 95−100
−34.4%
|
120−130
+34.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−47.4%
|
27−30
+47.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
−21.4%
|
16−18
+21.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−30.8%
|
16−18
+30.8%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−47.6%
|
30−35
+47.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
−32.1%
|
35−40
+32.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−40%
|
35−40
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
−36%
|
65−70
+36%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
−68.4%
|
30−35
+68.4%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−16.7%
|
40−45
+16.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| World of Tanks | 40−45
−46.5%
|
60−65
+46.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−60%
|
16−18
+60%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−72.7%
|
18−20
+72.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8
−114%
|
14−16
+114%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 16−18
−37.5%
|
21−24
+37.5%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−47.1%
|
24−27
+47.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 114% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 675M SLI surpassed Pro WX 4130 in all 64 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.03 | 8.68 |
| Recency | 1 March 2017 | 6 January 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 2 Watt |
Pro WX 4130 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
GTX 675M SLI, on the other hand, has a 43.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 2400% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4130 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
