GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4130 with GeForce GTX 675M SLI, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4130
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.98

GTX 675M SLI outperforms Pro WX 4130 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking610508
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.872.95
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBaffinN12E-GTX2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2017 (8 years ago)6 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed1002 MHz620 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt2x 100 Watt
Texture fill rate42.12no data
Floating-point processing power1.348 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−75%
40−45
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−75%
40−45
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Fortnite 30−35
−53.1%
45−50
+53.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Valorant 60−65
−28.1%
80−85
+28.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−75%
40−45
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−39.6%
120−130
+39.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Dota 2 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Fortnite 30−35
−53.1%
45−50
+53.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Valorant 60−65
−28.1%
80−85
+28.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Dota 2 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Valorant 60−65
−28.1%
80−85
+28.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−53.1%
45−50
+53.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−51.2%
60−65
+51.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−16.7%
40−45
+16.7%
Valorant 60−65
−51.7%
90−95
+51.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Valorant 27−30
−55.6%
40−45
+55.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 18−20
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 675M SLI is ahead in 60 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.98 7.47
Recency 1 March 2017 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 2 Watt

Pro WX 4130 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 675M SLI, on the other hand, has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, and 2400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4130 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 4130
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4130 or GeForce GTX 675M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.