GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

Place in performance ranking	591	720
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.30	0.20
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Polaris	N13E-GE
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$2000	$679

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 4130 has 50% better value for money than GT 650M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	384
CUDA cores	no data	384
Core clock speed	no data	Up to 900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	900 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	42.12	Up to 27.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	no data	652.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 4130 and GeForce GT 650M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	1800 - 4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	Up to 80.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	no data	+
HDCP	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	Up to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	no data
3D Blu-Ray	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 API
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4130 5.09
+63.1%

GT 650M 3.12

Radeon Pro WX 4130 outperforms GeForce GT 650M by 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 4130 1966
+63.3%

GT 650M 1204

Radeon Pro WX 4130 outperforms GeForce GT 650M by 63% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	50−55 +61.3%	31 −61.3%
Full HD	55−60 +61.8%	34 −61.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9
+100%

4−5

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Hitman 3	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Hitman 3	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+75%

8−9
−75%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Hitman 3	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+80%

5−6

−80%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+100%

3−4

−100%

This is how Pro WX 4130 and GT 650M compete in popular games:

Pro WX 4130 is 61% faster in 900p
Pro WX 4130 is 62% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.09	3.12
Recency	1 March 2017	22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt