Radeon RX 6800M vs Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4200 Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 9200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with Radeon RX 6800M, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016, $399
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
8.80

6800M outperforms Pro 4100 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
RX 6800M RX 6800M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking527194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.45no data
Power efficiency13.5216.80
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBaffinNavi 22
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (9 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1125 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz2390 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate76.86382.4
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 4100 8.80
RX 6800M 31.70
+260%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3682
Samples: 254
RX 6800M 13259
+260%
Samples: 625

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−296%
107
+296%
1440p18−20
−294%
71
+294%
4K10−12
−330%
43
+330%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.78no data
1440p22.17no data
4K39.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 123
+0%
123
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+0%
110
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+0%
112
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 78
+0%
78
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 66
+0%
66
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+0%
84
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 51
+0%
51
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 51
+0%
51
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4100 and RX 6800M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800M is 296% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800M is 294% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800M is 330% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 69 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.80 31.70
Recency 10 November 2016 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 145 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has 190% lower power consumption.

RX 6800M, on the other hand, has a 260.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
P104-100 P104 100
RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800M
vs
RTX 2070 Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
R9 A375 Radeon R9 A375
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
R9 FURY X2 Radeon R9 FURY X2
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
HD 6250 IGP Radeon HD 6250 IGP
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
RX 5500M Radeon RX 5500M
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600M
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
R9 390X2 Radeon R9 390X2
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
RX 7700S Radeon RX 7700S
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
RX 7600S Radeon RX 7600S

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 53 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 339 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or Radeon RX 6800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.