Radeon RX 460 vs Pro WX 4100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

We've compared workstation GPU Radeon Pro WX 4100 with desktop GPU Radeon RX 460, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5
9.60

RX 460 outperforms Pro WX 4100 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking428399
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.011.28
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameBaffinPolaris 11 / Baffin XT
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (7 years ago)8 August 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $86
Current price$711 (1.8x MSRP)$397 (4.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 4100 has 57% better value for money than RX 460.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024896
Core clock speed1125 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8667.20
Floating-point performance2,460 gflops2,150 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSyncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4100 9.60
RX 460 10.59
+10.3%

RX 460 outperforms Pro WX 4100 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 4100 3717
RX 460 4100
+10.3%

RX 460 outperforms Pro WX 4100 by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−17.1%
41
+17.1%
1440p45−50
−22.2%
55
+22.2%
4K18−20
−11.1%
20
+11.1%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.60 10.59
Recency 10 November 2016 8 August 2016
Cost $399 $86
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon RX 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 460 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 42 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 895 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.