Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs Pro WX 4100
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.
R9 M295X Mac Edition outperforms Pro WX 4100 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 503 | 417 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.67 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.08 | 3.66 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | Amethyst |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 November 2016 (8 years ago) | 23 November 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 | 108.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.46 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1362 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 174.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.26 | 12.96 |
| Recency | 10 November 2016 | 23 November 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Pro WX 4100 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
R9 M295X Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 40% higher aggregate performance score.
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation card while Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
