ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Pro WX 4100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with Radeon HD 2600 XT, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
9.45
+1195%

Pro WX 4100 outperforms ATI HD 2600 XT by a whopping 1195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4621156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.180.01
Power efficiency13.091.12
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBaffinRV630
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (7 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 4100 has 31700% better value for money than ATI HD 2600 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024120
Core clock speed1125 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate76.866.400
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4100 9.45
+1195%
ATI HD 2600 XT 0.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3647
+1193%
ATI HD 2600 XT 282

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.45 0.73
Recency 10 November 2016 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has a 1194.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2600 XT, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 2600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 47 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 90 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.