GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with GeForce4 Ti 4200, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
8.36
+83500%

Pro 4100 outperforms Ti 4200 by a whopping 83500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5211566
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.38no data
Power efficiency13.51no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameBaffinNV25 A2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1125 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate76.862.000
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs648
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 4100 8.36
+83500%
GeForce4 Ti 4200 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3695
+73800%
Samples: 247
GeForce4 Ti 4200 5
Samples: 55

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.36 0.01
Recency 10 November 2016 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

Pro WX 4100 has a 83500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce4 Ti 4200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
GeForce4 Ti 4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 53 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 55 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or GeForce4 Ti 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.