GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pro WX 4100
2016
4 GB GDDR5
9.60
+50.2%

Radeon Pro WX 4100 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 50% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking425540
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Value for money2.052.64
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBaffinN17P-G1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (7 years ago)17 May 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $79
Current price$711 (1.8x MSRP)$137 (1.7x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 1030 has 29% better value for money than Pro WX 4100.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed1125 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz1670 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8635.23
Floating-point performance2,460 gflops1,127 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4100 9.60
+50.2%
GT 1030 6.39

Radeon Pro WX 4100 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 50% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 4100 3717
+50.3%
GT 1030 2473

Radeon Pro WX 4100 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 50% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro WX 4100 19002
+95.8%
GT 1030 9705

Radeon Pro WX 4100 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 96% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+40%
25
−40%
1440p30−35
+42.9%
21
−42.9%
4K12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.60 6.39
Recency 10 November 2016 17 May 2017
Cost $399 $79
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 30 Watt

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1030 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation card while GeForce GT 1030 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 42 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7075 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.