Radeon RX 6700 vs Pro WX 3200

Place in performance ranking	546	55
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.23	27.90
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	Navi 22
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	26 September 2019 (4 years ago)	9 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data
Current price	$740 (3.7x MSRP)	$551

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 has 764% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2304
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2450 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.44	352.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	10 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	320.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 6.30

RX 6700 49.13
+680%

RX 6700 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 680% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 3200 2433

RX 6700 18973
+680%

RX 6700 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 680% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	19 −637%	140−150 +637%
4K	8 −650%	60−65 +650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

−900%

10−11
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	7−8
Battlefield 5	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −700%	24 +700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −767%	24−27 +767%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	7−8
Battlefield 5	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Metro Exodus	0−1	7
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1400%	15 +1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −767%	24−27 +767%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	7−8
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −900%	10 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −767%	24−27 +767%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−750%

16−18

+750%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	6−7
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Hitman 3	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Metro Exodus	0−1	6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	3−4
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	3−4

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−1000%

10−12
+1000%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	5−6
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	4−5
Hitman 3	0−1	2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	5

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	4−5
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	3−4
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	3−4
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	6−7
Metro Exodus	0−1	7−8
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

7−8

This is how Pro WX 3200 and RX 6700 compete in popular games:

RX 6700 is 637% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 is 650% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.30	49.13
Recency	26 September 2019	9 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	10 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	175 Watt