GeForce RTX 4050 vs Radeon Pro W6900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated119
Place by popularitynot in top-10055
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Boost clock speed2150 MHz2640 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate688.0211.2
Floating-point processing power22.02 gflopsno data
ROPs12832
TMUs32080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
WidthQuad-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s216.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 100 Watt

Pro W6900X has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6900X and GeForce RTX 4050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6900X is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon Pro W6900X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1768 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.