RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated73
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.08
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402816
Core clock speed1800 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1967 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate472.1187.4
ROPs9648
TMUs24088
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Cores6022

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm168 mm
WidthQuad-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2021 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 70 Watt

Pro W6800X Duo has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 471.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is a workstation graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 39 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 20 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.