Tesla M2090 vs Radeon Pro W6600X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro W6600X and Tesla M2090, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Pro W6600X outperforms Tesla M2090 by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 186 | 513 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 20.58 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 19.78 | 2.65 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Navi 23 | GF110 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 August 2021 (3 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 2068 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2479 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 11,060 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 317.3 | 41.66 |
| Floating-point processing power | 10.15 TFLOPS | 1.332 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 48 |
| TMUs | 128 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 248 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 924 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 177.4 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 30.37 | 8.47 |
| Recency | 3 August 2021 | 25 July 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
Pro W6600X has a 258.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.
The Radeon Pro W6600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
