Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs Pro W6600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600X with Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600X
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.96
+682%

Pro W6600X outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking143634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23Raphael
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2021 (2 years ago)26 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048128
Boost clock speed2479 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate317.3no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro W6600X and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed16 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+637%
19
−637%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Hitman 3 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 19
+850%
2−3
−850%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Hitman 3 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1

This is how Pro W6600X and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600X is 637% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.96 4.34
Recency 3 August 2021 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm

The Radeon Pro W6600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600X is a workstation card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
Radeon Pro W6600X
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 207 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.