GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W6600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro W6400 Pro W6600 Pro W6600X Pro W6800 Pro W6800X Pro W6800X Duo Pro W6900X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1650 Mobile 1650 Max-Q 1650 Mobile Refresh 1650 Ti Max-Q 1650 Ti Mobile 1660 Max-Q 1660 Mobile 1660 Ti Mobile 1660 Ti Max-Q 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600X with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600X
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
31.29
+48.8%

Pro W6600X outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro W6600X Pro W6600X
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.8023.33
Power efficiency19.8826.73
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2021 (4 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 12% better value for money than Pro W6600X.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speed2068 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed2479 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate317.3128.2
Floating-point processing power10.15 TFLOPS4.101 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs12896
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro W6600X 31.29
+48.8%
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 21.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600X 13113
+48.8%
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+39.2%
79
−39.2%
4K45−50
+36.4%
33
−36.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.35
−119%
2.90
+119%
4K15.53
−124%
6.94
+124%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 119% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 124% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
God of War 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 92
+0%
92
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
God of War 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
God of War 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
God of War 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 93
+0%
93
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
God of War 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Pro W6600X and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600X is 39% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600X is 36% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.29 21.03
Recency 3 August 2021 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 60 Watt

Pro W6600X has a 48.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W6600X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600X is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
Radeon Pro W6600X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6600X
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 5600M Radeon RX 5600M
Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6600X
vs
A10G A10G
RTX 5060 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
vs
Data Center GPU Max 1100 Center GPU Max 1100
R5 A220 AMD Radeon R5 A220
vs
FirePro M4170 FirePro M4170
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
Jetson TX2 Jetson TX2
RTX 5080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
vs
Jetson TX1 Jetson TX1
Pro 580X AMD Radeon Pro 580X
vs
Pro W6600X Pro W6600X
PRO W7800 48 GB AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
vs
Pro W5500X Pro W5500X
RTX 3050 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
vs
530 Mobile GDDR5 Radeon 530 Mobile GDDR5
RTX 5090 DD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 DD
vs
RTX 5000 X2 Mobile RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
RTX 3060 GDDR6X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 GDDR6X
vs
Riva TNT2 Riva TNT2
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
vs
Riva TNT2 Riva TNT2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 587 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600X or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.