Radeon PRO V710 vs Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
28.27

PRO V710 outperforms Pro W6600M by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking224179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.2114.72
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 32
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923456
Core clock speed1224 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8432.0
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs112216
Ray Tracing Cores2854

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB28 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro W6600M 28.27
PRO V710 32.88
+16.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 11287
PRO V710 13129
+16.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−14.6%
180−190
+14.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−14.6%
180−190
+14.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%
Fortnite 130−140
−15.4%
150−160
+15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Valorant 180−190
−11.1%
200−210
+11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−14.6%
180−190
+14.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−11.5%
300−310
+11.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%
Dota 2 120−130
−16.3%
150−160
+16.3%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%
Fortnite 130−140
−15.4%
150−160
+15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
−12.2%
110−120
+12.2%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
Valorant 180−190
−11.1%
200−210
+11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%
Dota 2 120−130
−16.3%
150−160
+16.3%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
Valorant 180−190
−11.1%
200−210
+11.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−15.4%
150−160
+15.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−14.6%
220−230
+14.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−14.3%
200−210
+14.3%
Valorant 210−220
−14.2%
250−260
+14.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−11.1%
80−85
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−11.9%
75−80
+11.9%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Valorant 160−170
−10.4%
180−190
+10.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
−14.9%
100−105
+14.9%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.27 32.88
Recency 8 June 2021 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 158 Watt

Pro W6600M has 75.6% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 16.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600M or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.