Arc A380 vs Radeon Pro W6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6400 with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6400
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
20.84

Arc A380 outperforms Pro W6400 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking246174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation73.3914.21
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 24DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current price$206 $591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W6400 has 416% better value for money than Arc A380.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speedno data2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2331 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate111.9131.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed14 GB/s15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6400 20.84
Arc A380 29.74
+42.7%

Arc A380 outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 by 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W6400 8047
+29%
Arc A380 6238

Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms Arc A380 by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−50%
45
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−52.5%
61
+52.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−42.9%
50
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−49.2%
95−100
+49.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−48.9%
65−70
+48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−52%
75−80
+52%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−52%
76
+52%
Hitman 3 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−44.3%
101
+44.3%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−43.1%
90−95
+43.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−54%
75−80
+54%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−44.6%
94
+44.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−57.1%
55
+57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−42.9%
50
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−54.2%
37
+54.2%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−49.2%
95−100
+49.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−48.9%
65−70
+48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−52%
75−80
+52%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−44.7%
120−130
+44.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−47.5%
110−120
+47.5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−42.9%
30
+42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−54%
75−80
+54%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−45.5%
80
+45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−46.7%
66
+46.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−61.1%
29
+61.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−47.6%
31
+47.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−48.9%
65−70
+48.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−62.9%
57
+62.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−48.6%
52
+48.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−52.5%
61
+52.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−61.9%
34
+61.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−56.3%
25
+56.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−54%
75−80
+54%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−60%
55−60
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−46.7%
65−70
+46.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−55.6%
40−45
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−48.6%
50−55
+48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%
Hitman 3 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−55%
60−65
+55%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−62.9%
55−60
+62.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−51.1%
65−70
+51.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−44.4%
35−40
+44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Hitman 3 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−51.9%
40−45
+51.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%

This is how Pro W6400 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.84 29.74
Recency 19 January 2022 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 740 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.