GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5700X

Place in performance ranking	65	115
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 10	GN20-E5 GA104
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	11 December 2019 (4 years ago)	4 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	5120
Core clock speed	no data	780 - 1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	2040 MHz	1290 - 1620 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	293.8	287.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro W5700X and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	305 mm	no data
Width	Quad-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	320.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5700X 45.54
+22.5%

RTX 3070 Mobile 37.19

Radeon Pro W5700X outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W5700X 17590
+22.5%

RTX 3070 Mobile 14364

Radeon Pro W5700X outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	130−140 +14%	114 −14%
1440p	90−95 +20%	75 −20%
4K	55−60 +14.6%	48 −14.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

140−150
+17.6%

119

−17.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +21.2%	65−70 −21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +20.9%	91 −20.9%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +16.7%	120−130 −16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +18.4%	75−80 −18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 +21.5%	107 −21.5%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +17.3%	80−85 −17.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +18.3%	90−95 −18.3%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +21.7%	189 −21.7%
Hitman 3	130−140 +14%	114 −14%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +20.6%	199 −20.6%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +19.3%	100−110 −19.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +20.9%	90−95 −20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 +20.5%	224 −20.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +12.4%	89 −12.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +21.2%	65−70 −21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +18.4%	76 −18.4%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +16.7%	120−130 −16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +18.4%	75−80 −18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−105 +13.6%	88 −13.6%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +17.3%	80−85 −17.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +18.3%	90−95 −18.3%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +18.1%	140−150 −18.1%
Hitman 3	110−120 +19.6%	92 −19.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +20%	150−160 −20%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +20%	125 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +17.6%	85 −17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 +20.2%	183 −20.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	200−210 +17.6%	170 −17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 +21.5%	181 −21.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +21.2%	65−70 −21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80−85 +17.6%	68 −17.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +18.4%	75−80 −18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +21.6%	74 −21.6%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +17.3%	80−85 −17.3%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +19.8%	167 −19.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +21.2%	132 −21.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 +19%	168 −19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +17%	94 −17%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +16.7%	60 −16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−105

+22%

82
−22%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +19.7%	70−75 −19.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +22%	123 −22%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +13.2%	53 −13.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +16.1%	56 −16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +17%	47 −17%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +20.9%	91 −20.9%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +21.4%	140 −21.4%
Hitman 3	80−85 +17.6%	68 −17.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +16.1%	112 −16.1%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +20.9%	91 −20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 +20%	125 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +18.2%	55 −18.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
+16.4%

−16.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +21.6%	35−40 −21.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +12.9%	30−35 −12.9%
Hitman 3	45−50 +18.4%	38 −18.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +17%	45−50 −17%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +14.6%	48 −14.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +17.2%	64 −17.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +21.2%	33 −21.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +9.1%	22 −9.1%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +18.3%	93 −18.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +19%	63 −19%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +20.7%	58 −20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +11.1%	27 −11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+13.6%

−13.6%

This is how Pro W5700X and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

Pro W5700X is 14% faster in 1080p
Pro W5700X is 20% faster in 1440p
Pro W5700X is 15% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	45.54	37.19
Recency	11 December 2019	4 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	125 Watt