To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Pro W5700 vs Pro WX 8200
Price now
1473$
Games supported
99%
- Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory 8 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 14000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1200 MHz
- Max video memory 8 GB
- Memory type HBM2
- Memory clock speed 2000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Price now
2448$
Games supported
99%
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 67 | 86 |
| Value for money | 17.30 | 8.78 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 November 2019 (2 years ago) | 13 August 2018 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $999 |
| Current price | $1473 (1.8x MSRP) | $2448 (2.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 10,300 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 | 336.0 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 305 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.125 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Popular games
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 50.76 | 46.85 |
| Novelty | 19 November 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Cost | $799 | $999 |
| Memory bus width | 256 | 2048 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 3584 |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 | 512 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 230 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon Pro W5700 by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon Pro W5700's NVIDIA equivalent is Quadro RTX 4000, which is faster by 3% and higher by 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro W5700:
Competitors of Radeon Pro WX 8200 by NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Pro WX 8200 from NVIDIA is Quadro M6000 24 GB, which is slower by 11% and lower by 20 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro WX 8200:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
