Quadro NVS 320M vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 with Quadro NVS 320M, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
39.35
+7187%

Pro W5700 outperforms NVS 320M by a whopping 7187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1011184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation41.77no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)G8x (2007−2008)
GPU code nameNavi 10G84M
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date19 November 2019 (4 years ago)9 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data
Current price$748 (0.9x MSRP)$66

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230432
Core clock speedno data575 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate277.99.200
Floating-point performanceno data73.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro W5700 and Quadro NVS 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-HE
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3, GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5700 39.35
+7187%
NVS 320M 0.54

Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms Quadro NVS 320M by 7187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W5700 15196
+7206%
NVS 320M 208

Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms Quadro NVS 320M by 7206% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%
Cyberpunk 2077 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Hitman 3 140−150
+6900%
2−3
−6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 850−900
+6983%
12−14
−6983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 500−550
+7043%
7−8
−7043%
Watch Dogs: Legion 650−700
+7122%
9−10
−7122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%
Cyberpunk 2077 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Hitman 3 140−150
+6900%
2−3
−6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 850−900
+6983%
12−14
−6983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 500−550
+7043%
7−8
−7043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 650−700
+7122%
9−10
−7122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%
Cyberpunk 2077 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 850−900
+6983%
12−14
−6983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 500−550
+7043%
7−8
−7043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 650−700
+7122%
9−10
−7122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 290−300
+7150%
4−5
−7150%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Hitman 3 400−450
+6567%
6−7
−6567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 210−220
+6900%
3−4
−6900%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Metro Exodus 290−300
+7150%
4−5
−7150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+6900%
2−3
−6900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.35 0.54
Recency 19 November 2019 9 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 20 Watt

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation card while Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Quadro NVS 320M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 86 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.