L4 vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 and L4, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro W5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
32.84
+49.4%

Pro W5700 outperforms L4 by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking163264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.30no data
Power efficiency12.9124.61
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 November 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23047424
Core clock speed1243 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt72 Watt
Texture fill rate277.9489.6
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPS30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs144240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mm169 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s300.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro W5700 32.84
+49.4%
L4 21.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W5700 14521
+49.4%
Samples: 295
L4 9719
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.84 21.98
Recency 19 November 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 72 Watt

Pro W5700 has a 49.4% higher aggregate performance score.

L4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 184.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the L4 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
NVIDIA L4
L4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 114 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 43 votes

Rate L4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700 or L4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.