ATI FireGL V7600 vs Radeon Pro W5700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking116not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.23no data
Power efficiency13.13no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 10R600
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 November 2019 (4 years ago)6 November 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304240
Core clock speed1243 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt127 Watt
Texture fill rate277.97.200
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPS0.288 TFLOPS
ROPs6412
TMUs14412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length305 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2019 6 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 127 Watt

Pro W5700 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7600, on the other hand, has 61.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5700 and FireGL V7600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
ATI FireGL V7600
FireGL V7600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 92 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.