RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs Radeon Pro W5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking544not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.49no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 14GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14082560
Core clock speed1000 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1177 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate127.694.16
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPS6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 95 Watt

Pro W5500M has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 11.8% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500M and RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500M or RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.