FirePro A320 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking543not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.50no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 14Trinity GL
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408384
Core clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz955 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate127.622.92
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPS0.7334 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8824
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 100 Watt

Pro W5500M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500M and FirePro A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro A320 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
AMD FirePro A320
FirePro A320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500M or FirePro A320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.