ATI FireGL 8800 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking483not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.27no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 14R200
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate127.62.400
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz290 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s9.28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

Pro W5500M has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500M and FireGL 8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation card while FireGL 8800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
ATI FireGL 8800
FireGL 8800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FireGL 8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.