A30 PCIe vs Radeon Pro W5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking546not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.48no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 14GA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14083584
Core clock speed1000 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1440 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate127.6322.6
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPS10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs88224
Tensor Coresno data224
L1 Cacheno data10.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s933.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 165 Watt

Pro W5500M has 94.1% lower power consumption.

A30 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500M and A30 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while A30 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
NVIDIA A30 PCIe
A30 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate A30 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500M or A30 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.