Radeon R7 350 vs Pro W5500

Place in the ranking	233	596
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	43.22	no data
Power efficiency	13.15	7.06
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Navi 14	Cape Verde
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)	6 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	512
Core clock speed	1187 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1400 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,400 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	123.2	25.60
Floating-point processing power	3.942 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	88	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	168 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.63	5.58
Recency	10 February 2020	6 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	55 Watt

Pro W5500 has a 323.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.