Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Pro Vega II

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.43no data
Power efficiency5.97no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVega 20Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)23 July 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964096
Core clock speed1574 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate440.3747.5
Floating-point processing power14.09 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs256256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthQuad-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB32 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed806 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth825.3 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt4x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 300 Watt

AI PRO R9700 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 58.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega II and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 81 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega II or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.