Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro Vega II

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Instinct MI50 Radeon Instinct MI60 Radeon Pro V420 Radeon Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro VII
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega II with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega II
2019
32 GB HBM2, 475 Watt
40.58
+295%

Pro Vega II outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 295% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro Vega II Pro Vega II
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105449
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.01no data
Power efficiency5.86no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVega 20Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409696
Core clock speed1574 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1720 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Wattno data
Texture fill rate440.3no data
Floating-point processing power14.09 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed806 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth825.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderboltno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 42 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 40.58 10.27
Recency 3 June 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

Pro Vega II has a 295.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon Pro Vega II is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
vs
Pro W6800X Radeon Pro W6800X
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Quadro P520 P520
vs
T1000 T1000
Quadro P520 P520
vs
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
vs
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU M4 8 core GPU
RX 5770 RX 5770
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
vs
RTX A4500 Embedded RTX A4500 Embedded
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
vs
UHD Graphics 16EU UHD Graphics 16EU
RTX 4000 Max-Q RTX 4000 Max-Q
vs
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q
vs
RX 6950 XT RX 6950 XT
Quadro T1000 T1000
vs
RX 7500 XT RX 7500 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4 81 vote

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2683 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega II or Iris Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.