GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon Pro Vega II

Place in performance ranking	93	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	30.32
Architecture	GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Vega 20	AD103-275
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)	24 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,199	$799
Current price	$9999 (4.5x MSRP)	$820 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega II and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	8448
Core clock speed	1574 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	1720 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	13,230 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	475 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	440.3	689.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Apple MPX	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	Quad-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1612 MBps	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	825.3 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega II 40.38

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.07
+103%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms Radeon Pro Vega II by 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega II 15596

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31696
+103%

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms Radeon Pro Vega II by 103% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −116%	216 +116%
1440p	70−75 −114%	150 +114%
4K	45−50 −104%	92 +104%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −118%	130−140 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −113%	140−150 +113%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −103%	240−250 +103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −115%	110−120 +115%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −112%	200−210 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −109%	250−260 +109%
Hitman 3	60−65 −105%	120−130 +105%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −104%	300−350 +104%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −113%	140−150 +113%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −107%	120−130 +107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 −112%	467 +112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −114%	171 +114%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −118%	130−140 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −113%	140−150 +113%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −103%	240−250 +103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −115%	110−120 +115%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −112%	200−210 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −109%	250−260 +109%
Hitman 3	60−65 −105%	120−130 +105%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −104%	300−350 +104%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −113%	140−150 +113%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −107%	120−130 +107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 −110%	442 +110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	210−220 −105%	430 +105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −107%	140−150 +107%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −118%	130−140 +118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 −113%	140−150 +113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −115%	110−120 +115%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −109%	250−260 +109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −104%	300−350 +104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 −104%	407 +104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 −110%	210 +110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −106%	144 +106%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
−107%

120−130

+107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −108%	160−170 +108%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −106%	140−150 +106%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −120%	95−100 +120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −116%	100−110 +116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −104%	110−120 +104%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −108%	187 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −112%	210−220 +112%
Hitman 3	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −123%	220−230 +123%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −113%	120−130 +113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 −104%	306 +104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −112%	159 +112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −111%	116 +111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
−110%

120−130

+110%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −120%	85−90 +120%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −130%	65−70 +130%
Hitman 3	35−40 −117%	75−80 +117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −109%	130−140 +109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −120%	110 +120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −118%	130−140 +118%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −106%	70−75 +106%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −130%	65−70 +130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −117%	50−55 +117%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −106%	160−170 +106%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −109%	130−140 +109%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −124%	100−110 +124%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −130%	69 +130%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−120%

95−100
+120%

This is how Pro Vega II and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 116% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 114% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 104% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	40.38	82.07
Recency	3 June 2019	24 January 2024
Cost	$2199	$799
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	475 Watt	285 Watt