Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Pro Vega II Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro V420 Pro Vega II Pro Vega II Duo Pro VII
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5800 5800 XT 6400 6500 XT 6600 6600 LE 6600 XT 6650 XT 6700 XT 6750 XT 6800 6800 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega II Duo
2019
32 GB HBM2, 475 Watt
36.35

RX 6650 XT outperforms Pro Vega II Duo by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro Vega II Duo Pro Vega II Duo
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12879
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.1264.05
Power efficiency5.6218.64
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 20Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6650 XT has 800% better value for money than Pro Vega II Duo.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Core clock speed1400 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz2635 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate440.3337.3
Floating-point processing power14.09 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthQuad-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.02 TB/s280.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega II Duo 36.35
RX 6650 XT 44.70
+23%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega II Duo 14018
RX 6650 XT 17240
+23%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−28.2%
141
+28.2%
1440p55−60
−30.9%
72
+30.9%
4K30−35
−23.3%
37
+23.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+0%
108
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
+0%
222
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 173
+0%
173
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 193
+0%
193
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+0%
107
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65
+0%
65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
+0%
129
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124
+0%
124
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 23
+0%
23
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Pro Vega II Duo and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 28% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 31% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 23% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 36.35 44.70
Recency 3 June 2019 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 176 Watt

Pro Vega II Duo has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 23% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 169.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
vs
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
vs
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
RX 5770 Radeon RX 5770
vs
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
vs
RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3000 X2 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 182 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3163 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.