Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega II Duo
2019
32 GB HBM2, 475 Watt
34.24
+675%

Pro Vega II Duo outperforms Iris Plus Graphics by a whopping 675% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154683
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.17no data
Power efficiency5.1921.21
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameVega 20Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×2512
Core clock speed1400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1720 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate440.3 ×232.00
Floating-point processing power14.09 TFLOPS ×21.024 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×28
TMUs256 ×232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 3.0 x1
WidthQuad-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.02 TB/s ×2no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x ThunderboltNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro Vega II Duo 34.24
+675%
Iris Plus Graphics 4.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega II Duo 14018
+675%
Iris Plus Graphics 1808

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.24 4.42
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 15 Watt

Pro Vega II Duo has a 674.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has 3066.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a workstation graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 183 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 410 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega II Duo or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.