Radeon RX 7900M vs Pro Vega 64X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64X with Radeon RX 7900M, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 64X
2019
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
34.78

RX 7900M outperforms Pro Vega 64X by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.5923.04
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date19 March 2019 (5 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964608
Core clock speed1250 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate375.8601.9
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPS38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs256288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 64X 34.78
RX 7900M 60.14
+72.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 64X 13369
RX 7900M 23115
+72.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−75.6%
158
+75.6%
1440p65−70
−81.5%
118
+81.5%
4K50−55
−78%
89
+78%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Dota 2 139
+0%
139
+0%
Far Cry 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 344
+0%
344
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
World of Tanks 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 249
+0%
249
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+0%
131
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

This is how Pro Vega 64X and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 76% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 82% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 78% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.78 60.14
Recency 19 March 2019 19 October 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 180 Watt

RX 7900M has a 72.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 64X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7900M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 62 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.