Radeon RX 7400 vs Pro Vega 64X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking185not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)8 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961792
Core clock speed1250 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate375.8257.6
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 March 2019 8 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 43 Watt

Pro Vega 64X has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 481.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 36 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64X or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.