RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro Vega 16 Pro Vega 20 Pro Vega 48 Pro Vega 56 Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64X and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro Vega 64X
2019
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
31.95

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms Pro 64X by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro Vega 64X Pro Vega 64X
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking190156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.8260.60
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameVega 10GB206
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963328
Core clock speed1250 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate375.8172.3
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs256104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cache1 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−18.2%
130
+18.2%
1440p60−65
−15%
69
+15%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Pro Vega 64X and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 18% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 15% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.95 35.48
Recency 19 March 2019 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 45 Watt

Pro Vega 64X has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has a 11% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 455.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 64X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
vs
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
GTX 745 OEM GeForce GTX 745 OEM
vs
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
Switch GPU Switch GPU
vs
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
GB10 GB10
vs
RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile
R6 M340DX Radeon R6 M340DX
vs
GeForce 840A GeForce 840A
Steam Deck 8CU Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
RTX 5070 SUPER GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
RTX 5080 SUPER GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
RTX 5070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GB10 GB10
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
vs
Arc Pro B50 Pro B50

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 37 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64X or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.