Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Place in performance ranking	130	193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	66.26	11.46
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Alchemist
GPU code name	Vega 10	DG2-512
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	19 March 2019 (5 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329
Current price	$366	$597 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 64X has 478% better value for money than Arc A770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	4096
Core clock speed	1250 MHz	2100 MHz
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	375.8	614.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Arc A770 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 64X 35.50
+37.3%

Arc A770 25.86

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms Arc A770 by 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 64X 13708
+37.3%

Arc A770 9984

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms Arc A770 by 37% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140−150 +28.4%	109 −28.4%
1440p	90−95 +34.3%	67 −34.3%
4K	55−60 +31%	42 −31%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+31%

40−45

−31%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +30.8%	65 −30.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 +30.4%	92 −30.4%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +29.4%	85−90 −29.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +32.1%	50−55 −32.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +31%	40−45 −31%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +35.6%	55−60 −35.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +34.3%	65−70 −34.3%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +36.4%	33 −36.4%
Hitman 3	70−75 +34.6%	50−55 −34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	270−280 +33%	203 −33%
Metro Exodus	190−200 +31.9%	144 −31.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +32.4%	65−70 −32.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +31.6%	304 −31.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +37.3%	102 −37.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +33.9%	56 −33.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +26.6%	79 −26.6%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +29.4%	85−90 −29.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +32.1%	50−55 −32.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +31%	40−45 −31%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +35.6%	55−60 −35.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +34.3%	65−70 −34.3%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +35.1%	110−120 −35.1%
Hitman 3	70−75 +34.6%	50−55 −34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +37.3%	100−110 −37.3%
Metro Exodus	170−180 +31.8%	129 −31.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +32.4%	65−70 −32.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 +35.7%	258 −35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	260−270 +32.7%	196 −32.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +37%	70−75 −37%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +33.3%	45 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +31.9%	72 −31.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +32.1%	50−55 −32.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +31%	40−45 −31%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +35.6%	55−60 −35.6%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +30.4%	23 −30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +32.2%	121 −32.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	290−300 +34.3%	216 −34.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +31.9%	72 −31.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +35.1%	74 −35.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
+32.4%

65−70

−32.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +32.7%	45−50 −32.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +35.3%	133 −35.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +25%	40 −25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80−85 +33.3%	60 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +34.1%	82 −34.1%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +20%	15 −20%
Hitman 3	40−45 +29%	30−35 −29%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +30%	100 −30%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +31.9%	91 −31.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +32.9%	158 −32.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +33.3%	60 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +35.6%	59 −35.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+27.9%

40−45

−27.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%
Hitman 3	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +32.7%	49 −32.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +37%	73 −37%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +33.3%	30 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +31.6%	38 −31.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +25%	8 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +30.8%	65 −30.8%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +33.9%	56 −33.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +35.1%	37 −35.1%