RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking201not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.48no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD103
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40969728
Core clock speed1250 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6510.7
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS32.69 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs256304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cache1 MB9.5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation has an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.