ATI Radeon VE vs Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2211608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.63no data
Power efficiency10.57no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameVega 10Rage 6
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (8 years ago)19 February 2001 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1138 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate280.00.55
Floating-point processing power8.96 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs2243
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 56 12061
+602950%
Samples: 27
ATI VE 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96no data
4K57no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.16no data
4K7.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 160−170 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 70−75 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Counter-Strike 2 160−170 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 95−100 no data
Fortnite 130−140 no data
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 5 90−95 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 no data
Valorant 180−190 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Counter-Strike 2 160−170 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Dota 2 107 no data
Far Cry 5 95−100 no data
Fortnite 130−140 no data
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 5 90−95 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116 no data
Valorant 180−190 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Dota 2 102 no data
Far Cry 5 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64 no data
Valorant 180−190 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 65−70 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 220−230 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42 no data
Valorant 170−180 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Dota 2 96 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2017 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 23 Watt

Pro Vega 56 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

ATI VE, on the other hand, has 813% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon VE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon VE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 93 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon VE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 56 or Radeon VE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.