Radeon Instinct MI300A vs Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.63no data
Power efficiency10.57no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date14 August 2017 (8 years ago)6 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358419456
Core clock speed1138 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate280.02,554
Floating-point processing power8.96 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs64no data
TMUs2241216
Tensor Coresno data1216
L1 Cache896 KB4.8 MB
L2 Cache4 MB16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB192 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s10.3 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2017 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 192 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 750 Watt

Pro Vega 56 has 257% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon Instinct MI300A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI300A is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 93 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 56 or Radeon Instinct MI300A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.