ATI FireGL V3600 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking209not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.29no data
Power efficiency10.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10RV630
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date14 August 2017 (7 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584120
Core clock speed1138 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt73 Watt
Texture fill rate280.04.800
Floating-point processing power8.96 TFLOPS0.144 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2017 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 73 Watt

Pro Vega 56 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V3600, on the other hand, has 187.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 56 and FireGL V3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a mobile workstation graphics card while FireGL V3600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
ATI FireGL V3600
FireGL V3600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 93 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 56 or FireGL V3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.