CMP 170HX 8 GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.74no data
Power efficiency10.58no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10GA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date14 August 2017 (8 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844480
Core clock speed1138 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate280.0394.8
Floating-point processing power8.96 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs224280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cache896 KB13.1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s1.49 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2017 1 September 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 250 Watt

Pro Vega 56 has 19% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 56 and CMP 170HX 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a mobile workstation graphics card while CMP 170HX 8 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
CMP 170HX 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 93 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 109 votes

Rate CMP 170HX 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 56 or CMP 170HX 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.