Radeon Pro W6400 vs Pro Vega 48

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 48 with Radeon Pro W6400, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 48
2019
8 GB HBM2
26.93
+33.7%

Pro 48 outperforms Pro W6400 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking241308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.94
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072768
Core clock speed1200 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6111.9
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs19248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache768 KB256 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro Vega 48 26.93
+33.7%
Pro W6400 20.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 48 11269
+33.7%
Samples: 17
Pro W6400 8428
Samples: 146

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.93 20.14
Recency 19 March 2019 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm

Pro Vega 48 has a 33.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 78 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 48 or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.